Local Innovation Partnerships Fund: competed strand (Grant)
The Local Innovation Partnerships Fund (LIPF) will invest up to £500 million into the development and scaling of high potential innovation clusters across the UK. The fund is deployed across an Earmarked Strand and a Competed Strand. The Competed Strand is a competitive route for partnerships outside of the Earmarked Strand.
- Opening date:
- Closing date:
Contents
Summary
Triple helix partnerships across the UK, excluding places in receipt of an Earmarked Award can apply for a maximum of £20 million.
The Competed strand provides an opportunity for places across the UK, outside of the earmarked regions, to demonstrate their innovation potential, including those with more polycentric geographies. Any proposed partnership must operate within a defined functional economic geography and clearly evidenced cluster(s).
Submissions can consider collaboration options both within and beyond administrative boundaries to ensure proposals have the required scale of impact.
Eligibility
All submissions must be made on behalf of a triple helix partnership. This is a core requirement of the Local Innovation Partnership Fund (LIPF). Each proposal will need to demonstrate that such a partnership is in place and is capable of developing a compelling portfolio of activities that support the growth of high potential innovation clusters.
The rationale behind the triple helix is well-established, having demonstrated successful implementation in national and international contexts, alongside previous UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) programmes. It brings together collective strengths of research and knowledge generation from academia, commercial expertise and market application from industry, and public sector leadership and strategic direction from civic institutions. Together, these are critical to regional decision-making and ensuring innovation-driven growth.
The lead organisation (’lead bidder’) should be agreed by the partnership on the basis of who is best placed to coordinate the response and represent the cluster opportunity. In many instances, this will be a mayoral strategic authority, combined authority or another form of regional leadership body with the necessary capacity and resources. However, there is the flexibility to designate a university or research organisation to take on a role where appropriate. The lead organisation will be required to access the UKRI Funding Service.
To apply on behalf of your triple helix partnership you must be based at an eligible organisation as follows:
higher education providers
research institutes
public sector research establishments
NHS bodies
independent research organisations. Check if your organisation is eligible
a Mayoral Strategic Authority, or other local government partner that has been granted non-standard eligibility for this funding opportunity
Mayoral strategic authorities and other local government partners that are not currently eligible organisations can apply for ‘non-standard’ eligibility limited to the LIPF and need to contact place@ukri.org to discuss their eligibility application.
Business and international organisations are not eligible to apply as the lead organisation (‘lead bidder’) on behalf of your triple helix partnership.
When you apply on behalf of your triple helix partnership you will be responsible for:
convening and coordinating the partnership, should this be the agreed approach locally
formally submitting the application, ensuring it reflects the local innovation strategy, the collective ambition and capabilities of the region and aligns with all readiness criteria
managing the project portfolio process, overseeing portfolio development and prioritisation processes through the triple helix governance and formally submitting the portfolio for quality assurance
The timeline for the readiness review process reflects the volume of responses anticipated. It may be extended if necessary.
Equality, diversity and inclusion
We are committed to achieving equality of opportunity for all funding applicants. We strongly encourage leadership and participation from a diverse range of people.
We support people to work in a way that suits their personal circumstances. This includes:
career breaks
support for people with caring responsibilities
flexible working
alternative working patterns
UKRI can offer disability and accessibility support for UKRI applicants and grant holders during the application and assessment process.
Objectives
Scope
The LIPF seeks to harness high-potential clusters to drive economic growth, deliver impact at scale and build long-lasting innovation capacity in places , ultimately supporting places to increase their competitive advantage. Partnerships are asked to submit project portfolios that directly support the growth of these high potential clusters, shaped around clearly defined needs and opportunities. Projects must have a distinct focus on near-to-market research and innovation with strong potential for commercial application, industry adoption and scalable impact.
The LIPF is not designed to support early discovery or blue-sky research. Instead, it aims to support the conversion of research excellence into tangible products, services, or technologies that deliver impact through increased productivity, greater investment, and the creation of high-value jobs.
The primary objectives of the LIPF are to:
foster the growth of mature innovation clusters by deepening their capabilities and expanding their reach
support emerging clusters, to grow and mature their ecosystems enhancing their capability of generating substantial economic value
support the adoption, diffusion, and commercialisation of new technologies
strengthen local partnerships and governance to deliver place-based innovation
The LIPF is designed to support a broad range of research and development (R&D) activities that ultimately accelerate research commercialisation, adoption of new technologies, support businesses to scale and grow and unlock private investment. Further details on what constitutes R&D expenditure can be found in Annex C of the HM Treasury budgeting guidance, specifically the ESA10 definition and the five criteria designed to help identify R&D.
All projects must be delivered within the five-year LIPF timescale, activities proposed for funding should not be financially dependent on sustained UKRI funding, either concluding within the programme window or supported by other sources of funding.
To be eligible for funding, projects must meet criteria around the type of activities that will be supported and clearly demonstrate how these activities will support the development of the identified priority clusters.
Each partnership will be expected to demonstrate that their portfolio of activities (not individual projects) can generate an absolute minimum private to public investment ratio of 1:1 during the delivery phase and 2:1 across the portfolio’s lifespan (7 year reporting period). Ideally, they should demonstrate how they could deliver a ratio of 3:1 over the lifespan. The focus on leveraging private sector activity from the LIPF is particularly important in the longer-term, even if it cannot be achieved out the outset of projects.
There is no prescribed number of clusters that is expected in a proposal. However, it is strongly advised that proposals ensure that funding is not spread thinly across several opportunities. Partnerships should focus on scale and impact, considering the optimal number of clusters and projects relative to the available funding, that form an impactful, deliverable portfolio.
See Additional information for further guidance.
Duration
The maximum duration of this award is for five years.
Funding available
The full economic cost (FEC) of your project portfolio including administrative costs can be up to £20 million.
UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) will fund 100% of the FEC for administrative funding to cover operating expenditure (opex) of your triple helix partnership up to £200,000. List all costs in ‘Exceptions’ and use the following subheadings as required when completing your application:
staff
equipment
travel and subsistence
other
Find out more about full economic costing.
UKRI typically issues funding directly to research organisations and businesses. However, in response to feedback from the Innovation Accelerator Pilot, UKRI will offer a hybrid approach as part of the LIPF. This model allows successful partnerships to identify a local anchor entity to administer grants for businesses, while UKRI continues funding research organisations at 80% FEC, bringing LIPF into better alignment with the government’s strategic objective to empower more local decision-making.
Trusted Research and Innovation (TR&I)
UKRI is committed in ensuring that effective international collaboration in research and innovation takes place with integrity and within strong ethical frameworks. Trusted Research and Innovation (TR&I) is a UKRI work programme designed to help protect all those working in our thriving and collaborative international sector by enabling partnerships to be as open as possible, and as secure as necessary. Our TR&I Principles set out UKRI’s expectations of organisations funded by UKRI in relation to due diligence for international collaboration.
As such, applicants for UKRI funding may be asked to demonstrate how their proposed projects will comply with our approach and expectation towards TR&I, identifying potential risks and the relevant controls you will put in place to help proportionately reduce these risks.
See further guidance and information about TR&I, including where applicants can find additional support.
Dates
Assessment process
We will assess your application using the following process:
stage 1: readiness check
stage 2: project portfolio
As with other research and innovation programmes, UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) will use an expert assessment process to ensure high-quality, objective, and timely decisions for research funding, appointing independent experts with relevant expertise to evaluate applications against established criteria, which can be viewed in the ‘How to apply’ section.
As part of the review process for both readiness and portfolio criteria, the expert panel will consider portfolio balance at a national programme level and in line with national capabilities. This approach seeks to avoid excessive investment in any one geographic area as well as to avoid dominance of any sector which could lead to the dilution of national capability.
Recognising the importance of transparency, feedback will be provided to partnerships. In unique cases, where a submission demonstrates strong potential but requires further evidence to confirm deliverability, partnerships may be invited to resubmit if time allows.
Readiness check (expression of interest)
The readiness check in this strand is designed as the response mechanism to the expression of interest (EOI), ensuring that submissions across both strands are assessed fairly against equal criteria, in line with the fund objectives. As this is a competitive process, the readiness check will be used to determine which submissions can progress to the next stage.
Given the highly competitive nature of this strand, the EOI stage balances funding accessibility with reduced applicant burden whilst supporting demand management. It is advised that submissions demonstrate clear collaboration and effective innovation governance and that in regions with multiple clusters, they should submit a single proposal, coordinated through one partnership that reflects all opportunities. It is crucial to showcase regional collaboration and coordination across institutions, whereby multiple clusters are managed through a unified, cohesive partnership.
The expert panel will be used to independently assess all submissions across the UK against the set criteria.
Final decisions on those places that are successful through this readiness gateway will be made by ministers. In reaching this decision they will consider the recommendations from the expert panel, the earmarked strand portfolio and the scale of award required. Ministers will seek to ensure adequate geographic and sectoral balancing that aligns with regional assets and national capability.Places that are successful will proceed into portfolio development and co-creation with UKRI.
Project portfolio
Successful places will continue to work in co-creation with UKRI to select a portfolio of projects. UKRI will work with places to develop high-quality, ready-to-invest proposals that can deliver significant impact rather than spreading resources across a large number of projects with smaller scale impact. UKRI recognises that places will have distinct set of circumstances and ways of working.
We will adopt a flexible approach to co-creation, ensuring each place receives tailored support to develop their own portfolio of projects. Individual project applications will be then assessed against a set of criteria available in the guidance document (see supporting documents in Additional information).
We will invite experts to assess individual projects and determine those projects that are at or above the quality threshold. Each triple helix partnership will then determine its short list of projects to be funded from those that are above the quality line. UKRI will continue to provide support via co-creation to ensure good governance, transparent decision making and to ensure a coherent local portfolio.
Principles of assessment
We support the San Francisco declaration on research assessment and recognise the relationship between research assessment and research integrity.
Find out about the UKRI principles of assessment and decision making.
Using generative artificial intelligence (AI) in expert review
Reviewers and panellists are not permitted to use generative AI tools to develop their assessment. Using these tools can potentially compromise the confidentiality of the ideas that applicants have entrusted to UKRI to safeguard.
For more detail see our policy on the use of generative AI.
Assessment areas
The assessment areas we will use for the readiness check are:
strategic vision and priority clusters
innovation strength and opportunity
governance and leadership
operational capability
resources and cost justification
Find details of assessment questions and criteria under the ‘Application questions’ heading in the ‘How to apply’ section.
How to apply
Click here to start application on the UKRI Funding Service Are you leading the project? - UKRI Funding Service
We are running this funding opportunity on the new UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Funding Service so please ensure that your organisation is registered. You cannot apply on the Joint Electronic Submissions (Je-S) system.
The project lead (‘lead bidder’) is responsible for completing the application process on the Funding Service, but we expect all team members and project partners to contribute to the application.
Only the lead organisation (‘lead bidder’) can submit an application to UKRI.
To apply
Select ‘Start application’ near the beginning of this Funding finder page.
Confirm you are the project lead (‘lead bidder’).
Sign in or create a Funding Service account. To create an account, select your organisation, verify your email address, and set a password. If your organisation is not listed, email support@funding-service.ukri.orgPlease allow at least 10 working days for your organisation to be added to the Funding Service. We strongly suggest that if you are asking UKRI to add your organisation to the Funding Service to enable you to apply to this opportunity, you also create an organisation Administration Account. This will be needed to allow the acceptance and management of any grant that might be offered to you.
Answer questions directly in the text boxes. You can save your answers and come back to complete them or work offline and return to copy and paste your answers. If we need you to upload a document, follow the upload instructions in the Funding Service. All questions and assessment criteria are listed in the How to apply section on this Funding finder page.
Allow enough time to check your application in ‘read-only’ view before sending to your research office.
Send the completed application to your research office for checking. They will return it to you if it needs editing.
Your research office will submit the completed and checked application to UKRI.
Where indicated, you can also demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant.
When including images, you must:
provide a descriptive caption or legend for each image immediately underneath it in the text box (this must be outside the image and counts towards your word limit)
insert each new image on a new line
use files smaller than 5MB and in JPEG, JPG, JPE, JFI, JIF, JFIF, PNG, GIF, BMP or WEBP format
Images should only be used to convey important visual information that cannot easily be put into words. The following are not permitted, and your application may be rejected if you include:
sentences or paragraphs of text
tables
excessive quantities of images
A few words are permitted where the image would lack clarity without the contextual words, such as a diagram, where text labels are required for an axis or graph column.
For more guidance on the Funding Service, see:
References
References should be included within the word count of the appropriate question section. You should use your discretion when including references and prioritise those most pertinent to the application.
Hyperlinks can be used in reference information. When including references, you should consider how your references will be viewed and used by the assessors, ensuring that:
references are easily identifiable by the assessors
references are formatted as appropriate to your research
persistent identifiers are used where possible
General use of hyperlinks
Applications should be self-contained. You should only use hyperlinks to link directly to reference information. You must not include links to web resources to extend your application. Assessors are not required to access links to conduct assessment or recommend a funding decision.
Generative artificial intelligence (AI)
Use of generative AI tools to prepare funding applications is permitted, however, caution should be applied.
For more information see our policy on the use of generative AI in application and assessment.
Deadline
UKRI must receive your application by 4:00pm UK time on 12 February 2026.
Further deadlines can be found in the opportunity timeline.
Make sure you are aware of and follow any internal institutional deadlines.
Following the submission of your application to the funding opportunity, your application cannot be changed, and applications will not be returned for amendment. If your application does not follow the guidance, it may be rejected.
Personal data
Processing personal data
UKRI will need to collect some personal information to manage your Funding Service account and the registration of your funding applications.
We will handle personal data in line with UK data protection legislation and manage it securely. For more information, including how to exercise your rights, read our privacy notice.
Sensitive information
If you or a core team member need to tell us something you wish to remain confidential, email place@ukri.org
Include in the subject line: [the funding opportunity title; sensitive information; your Funding Service application number].
Typical examples of confidential information include:
individual is unavailable until a certain date (for example due to parental leave)
declaration of interest
additional information about eligibility to apply that would not be appropriately shared in the ‘Applicant and team capability’ section
conflict of interest for UKRI to consider in reviewer or panel participant selection
the application is an invited resubmission
For information about how UKRI handles personal data, read UKRI’s privacy notice.
Publication of outcomes
If your application is successful, we will publish some personal information on the UKRI Gateway to Research.
Summary
Word limit: 500
In plain language, provide a summary we can use to identify the most suitable experts to assess your application. Clearly describe your submission in terms of:
context, geography, priority clusters and specialisms, highlighting unique advantage
the vision and innovation opportunity of the priority clusters present
the triple helix governance that will oversee the LIPF
track record and outline project opportunities
We usually make this summary publicly available on external-facing websites, therefore do not include any confidential or sensitive information. Make it suitable for a variety of readers, for example:
opinion-formers
policymakers
the public
the wider research community
Core team
Only list one individual as project lead. To be the project lead you must be affiliated with the organisation submitting the application on behalf of the triple helix partnership. You will be the main contact for UKRI.
project lead (PL)
Find out more about UKRI’s core team roles in funding applications.
Resources and cost justification
Word limit: 200
The triple helix partnership is eligible to apply for funding up to £200,000 to cover operating expenditure (opex) of the partnership. Explain how you intend to use this funding and justify:
all resources that have been costed as ‘Exceptions’
You can request costs associated with reasonable adjustments where they increase as a direct result of working on the project. For further information see Disability and accessibility support for UKRI applicants and grant holders.
We are not looking for detailed costs or a line-by-line breakdown of all resources. Overall, they want you to demonstrate how the resources you anticipate needing for your proposed work:
are comprehensive, appropriate, and justified
represent the optimal use of resources to achieve the intended outcomes
maximise potential outcomes and impacts
Strategic vision and priority clusters
Word limit:1,000
How closely aligned are the innovation objectives with economic growth plans, and how well-defined and evidenced are the priority cluster opportunities?
What the assessors are looking for in your response
Your response to the assessors should include:
cluster opportunities: clearly define priority innovation clusters, ensuring they are characterised by distinctive functional geographies, and have clear specialisms and characteristics that make them unique, with evidence demonstrating their growth potential. Cluster opportunities should be focused, to support or build critical mass
economic strategy and vision: demonstrate how the opportunities of the identified clusters align with Local Growth Plan priorities (or similar), link to wider economic objectives alongside UK strategic objectives such as the Industrial Strategy. For Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, proposals can instead be linked with national strategic priorities or UK strategic objectives such as the Industrial Strategy where relevant.
innovation strategy and priorities: outline how the identified clusters align with regional innovation priorities, demonstrating their contribution to regional objectives
Examples of supporting evidence to reference or include:
maps of priority clusters: visuals setting out the functional economic geography of identified clusters and their relationship to local infrastructure, assets, and industry sectors. Clusters may focus on a single sector or span multiple sector clusters but should have clear links with related innovation assets, plans or investments
cluster opportunity: evidencing of the growth potential of identified clusters, for example market analysis, sectoral trends, and evidence of demand or need
Upload a single PDF containing the documents (maximum of three pages).
Innovation strength and opportunity
Word limit: 1,000
How mature is the local innovation ecosystem, what areas require intervention to accelerate innovation-led growth, and how effectively are key stakeholders collaborating?
What the assessors are looking for in your response
Your response to the assessors should include:
stage of maturity: describe the stage of maturity of the current innovation ecosystem, the priority clusters (emerging versus established), and evidence of the R&D infrastructure, assets, and key actors that will support the opportunities identified
areas for intervention: identify market failures, barriers, or challenges within the innovation ecosystem that hinder growth but may be addressed through the LIPF, and how local investment and policy levers may be utilised in tandem
collaboration across the ecosystem: provide evidence of effective collaboration both within the triple helix partnership and across the ecosystem. This may include collaborative projects, programmes and priority setting, formal partnerships or joint ventures
Examples of supporting evidence:
ecosystem study: evidence from previous studies, including maps and diagrams that illustrates the key stakeholders and capabilities within the local innovation ecosystem and their relationship to proposed cluster opportunities
evidence of intervention need: references from reports, studies or data which illustrate the gaps or barriers within the ecosystem, such as access to finance, market readiness or talent shortage, and how these hinder innovation and cluster growth. This can include references to economic assessments, sector studies, independent reviews, national studies, and qualitative insights from key stakeholders
Upload a single PDF containing the documents (maximum of three pages).
Governance and leadership
Word limit: 500
How effective are the governance structures in place for overseeing innovation priorities, making strategic investment decisions, and ensuring transparency and fairness in decision-making processes?
What the assessors are looking for in your response
Your response to the assessors should include:
existing governance arrangements: present a clear governance framework capable of overseeing innovation priorities, making strategic judgements, and responsible for investment decisions
triple helix representation: ensure the governance proposed includes, as a minimum, representation from business, academia, and government. This representation should be meaningful, with each partner having a clear and active role
transparency and accountability: outline how the governance structure ensures transparency and accountability throughout the decision-making process
Examples of supporting evidence:
governance structure diagram: a visual representation of the governance structure, including the roles of key stakeholders and their relationship to one another
formal partnership agreement: any evidence which confirms there are existing formal agreements between partners set out the collaborative nature of the governance structure, for example a memorandum of understanding
Upload a single PDF containing the documents (maximum of three pages).
Operational capability
Word limit: 1,000
How effectively can the place manage the portfolio of projects, ensuring that operational systems, processes, and track records are in place to deliver large-scale innovation projects and achieve the desired impact?
What the assessors are looking for in your response
Your response to the assessors should include:
confidence in delivery: demonstrate experience in managing large-scale innovation programmes (or similar), with a focus on delivering projects on time, within budget, and with secured matched funding
project pipeline: provide a brief indication of the projects being considered that can be delivered within the timeframe of the LIPF programme and that align with its objectives
operational systems and resources: provide a brief overview of the systems and resources in place to manage and deliver innovation projects
Examples of supporting evidence:
previous innovation delivery: brief details on successful, relevant projects, highlighting examples of partner delivery, match funding, and how innovation has been translated into successful outcomes. This can be in a short, table rather than case study format
project portfolio: a list of potential or ongoing projects linked to the priority clusters, including brief descriptions, stage of development, cost and expected outcomes
Upload a single PDF containing the documents (maximum of three pages).
Supporting information
Research and innovation impact
Impact can be defined as the long-term intended or unintended effect research and innovation has on society, economy and the environment; to individuals, organisations, and the wider global population.
Webinar
We will hold an applicant webinar on 29 October 2025 at 1pm.
Research disruption due to COVID-19
We recognise that the COVID-19 pandemic has caused major interruptions and disruptions across our communities. We are committed to ensuring that individual applicants and their wider team, including partners and networks, are not penalised for any disruption to their career, such as:
breaks and delays
disruptive working patterns and conditions
the loss of ongoing work
role changes that may have been caused by the pandemic
Reviewers and panel members will be advised to consider the unequal impacts that COVID-19 related disruption might have had on the capability to deliver and career development of those individuals included in the application. They will be asked to consider the capability of the applicant and their wider team to deliver the research they are proposing.
Where disruptions have occurred, you can highlight this within your application if you wish, but there is no requirement to detail the specific circumstances that caused the disruption.